Let’s Talk About Tax

We are excited to introduce Teri Jackson, Fredrikson’s newest shareholder in the Tax Disputes & Litigation Group. Teri’s extensive experience at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and passion for helping clients bring valuable insights to our team. In this interview conducted by Masha Yevzelman, Teri shares her journey from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to representing taxpayers, offers advice for those facing audits, and dispels common misconceptions about working with the IRS.

On Thursday, June 20, 2024, the Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited tax decision in Moore v. U.S. And, an interesting set of opinions it is (all 83 pages of them)!

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear another tax case in the upcoming 2023-2024 session. This one, Moore v. United States, is a doozy...

The Supreme Court accepted United States v. Bittner for certiorari on June 21, 2021, and the case will be argued on Tuesday, November 02, 2022.

Since the beginning of the pandemic, Minnesota’s nexus waiver policy provided that the state will not assert nexus for business income tax or for sales and use tax purposes “solely because an employee is temporarily working from home due to the COVID-19 pandemic.”

If you are into Foreign Bank Account Reports (FBARs), your concern about penalties for failing to comply with those FinCEN 114 reporting rules just took an exciting, and perhaps fearsome, turn.

For years, remote workers had been complicating state tax compliance for companies. When the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Wayfair came out in June 2018, many believed that the decision’s economic nexus standards would reduce complexity surrounding remote workers.

Since 1959, taxpayers have been relying on a federal law—Public Law 86-272—to protect them from having to file state income tax returns in states where the taxpayers’ in-state activities are limited to just soliciting sales of tangible personal property. On August 4, 2021, the Multistate Tax Commission (MTC) member states voted 20-0 to revise the MTC’s “Statement of Information” regarding Public Law 86-272 in an attempt to eviscerate the federal law’s protections.